If you haven’t, you should. Doesn’t matter if you are an owner or a producer on a desk, this could be a game changer, and for much more than just LinkedIn messages and contacts.
In this email which NAPS Legal Counsel Bob Styles typically sends out on a monthly basis, tucked between two updates that didn’t have much application to my desk/business, was the below two paragraph notice about a yet to be adjudicated case titled “LinkedIn Messages As Evidence in Non-Compete Case“:
Did anyone else just feel the ground shake?
It doesn’t take much of an imagination to wonder about who then “owns” LinkedIn contacts? And by extension Facebook, Twitter, and for that matter any social network/media contacts that one compiles in pursuit of success as a search/sourcing/recruiting professional while in someone’s employ.
And please don’t misinterpret my intentions for bringing this up. I do not believe that anyone who signs a non-compete should EVER violate that agreement. If you leave one employer to work for another employer or to start your own business, do it the right way, take the high road, and honor your non compete. If you are that good, you don’t need to do anything illegal to get started on your new job or your new business. EVER. Period. There is always enough OTHER business out there for you.
Still, this case will bring up a whole new set of questions our profession, its owners, producers and lawyers will need to address. Not only can messages on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter now likely be used as evidence that you violated your non-compete, it can’t be long before “ownership” of those contacts comes into question as one leaves a job as a search or sourcing professional to begin a similar one somewhere else or on their own.
Article Continues Below
5 Ways to Hire Like It’s 2021
That’s why, in my mind, is case could become a game changer for how search professionals will use and manage the online social networks and social media tools that are now considered essential to success as a modern day sourcing and search professional.
What do you think?
I sure hope Mr Styles, Esq, will keep us up to date on how the case is finally adjudicated.
Oh, and for those interested, you can see the full Legal Update at skrentnyspeaks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/NAPS-June-2010-LEGAL-UPDATE-LinkedIn-As-Evidence.pdf because, as of this writing, NAPS does not yet archive these informative missives. I hope they will change that someday soon as they update and revise their new web presence.
I would love to read your thoughts on this, you can share them below.