JobDiva Claims Monster Infringed Its Patents

jobdiva logoJobDiva, software provider to the staffing industry, has filed a federal suit against Monster Worldwide, claiming the technology behind the company’s popular 6Sense search and matching engine infringes on patents it holds.

Monster logo 2011The complaint alleges “Monster has infringed JobDiva’s patents by incorporating JobDiva’s patented resume search technology into Monster’s products and services.” It goes on to say that Monster did this “despite being informed that JobDiva held patents covering the technology.”

Monster had no immediate comment on the suit, which was just filed Monday.

Details of the alleged infringement are skimpy. The complaint itself cites four  patents, one dating to 2003, each of which involves an automated means of parsing resumes and matching candidates. The earliest patent, obtained by JobDiva founder and CEO Diya Obeid, relates to extracting experience levels for various skills based on context.

The other patents, also obtained by Obeid, involve how the extracted data is stored, retrieved, and matched with job descriptions and recruiter search terms.

Article Continues Below

Contextual search lies at the heart of Monster’s 6Sense search technology. Monster acquired the components of this semantic search when it bought Trovix in 2008. In 2009, it unveiled Power Resume Search, which is powered by 6Sense. It allows searchers to more quickly narrow potentially hundreds of candidates to just a relevant few without having to construct complex Boolean strings. The strength of 6Sense lies in its ability to intuit experience levels and skills from job titles and similar parts of a resume or a job description.

Monster introduced its first products based on 6Sense in 2009, and has since added its cloud-based candidate search, SeeMore, and one or two other products to the roster.

JobDiva’s attorney, Dale Cendali, with Kirkland & Ellis in New York, declined to discuss the specifics of the suit or how JobDiva believes Monster is specifically infringing on its patents. She would only say that the patents involve “a specific way of doing resume search that is infringed.” Nor did she want to discuss why it took JobDiva four years after Monster’s introduction of 6Sense to bring an action.

John Zappe is the editor of and a contributing editor of John was a newspaper reporter and editor until his geek gene lead him to launch his first website in 1994. He developed and managed online newspaper employment sites and sold advertising services to recruiters and employers. Before joining ERE Media in 2006, John was a senior consultant and analyst with Advanced Interactive Media and previously was Vice President of Digital Media for the Los Angeles Newspaper Group.

Besides writing for ERE, John consults with staffing firms and employment agencies, providing content and managing their social media programs. He also works with organizations and businesses to assist with audience development and marketing. In his spare time  he can be found hiking in the California mountains or competing in canine agility and obedience competitions.

You can contact him here.


2 Comments on “JobDiva Claims Monster Infringed Its Patents

  1. The insane propaganda around patents can’t block the ugly truth: greed by the patent bar and companies, indifference by the courts, and incompetence at the patent office have resulted in software patents blocking out the sun.

    The sheer nerve of IBM saying they care about patent litigation abuse whilst going about actions like Kenexa v. Hireability is breathtaking.

    This problem is destroying small tech in America and we better get a handle on it. Leave it to the USA to ruin one of our more vital industries in a rent-seeking orgy of scholastic navel gazing at ‘patents’ that seek to give ownership to every idea ever thought.

    In this scheme, why not just outlaw competition altogether? After all, the presence of competitors is chilling to investment, and NOTHING must be allowed to let that happen…

    Meanwhile the deck is so stacked against someone accused of infringement that there can be no victory- the mere accusation is costly and inescapable, and anyone holding virtually any junk patent can accuse endlessly at no cost to themselves. Utterly disgusting.

    Copyright protection is enough for Star Wars and ought to be enough for too.

  2. Patent in IT Industry –Funny isn’t it.

    You can own Patent on a product but not on the Procedure/Logic/Syntax of the product. Considering the old logic only new(better) things will be developed..that’s the way Human World came this far…come on grow up.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *