Proactive Recruiting Metrics

A fundamental shift in recruiting values is now taking place inside organizations around the world. At the center of this shift is a focus on more proactive recruiting tactics in order to help drive a higher return on investment from recruiting and develop talent pipelines ahead of demand.

In a reactionary, requisition-driven recruiting model, overhead metrics such as cost, efficiency, and speed are adequate measurements of a recruiting department’s value to the organization. Cost-per-hire, staffing efficiency, and time-to-fill are still the primary metrics used in most organizations when recruiting reports to the business.

How much money did we save this year? Did we decrease our time to fill? Is the requisition load per recruiter at an optimal level?

These traditional metrics, while still important measures of overall efficiency, are not effective measures for a proactive recruiting team. In fact, they could ultimately reduce the effectiveness of such a group by necessitating that team members are incented to act in reactionary ways, such as:

  • Filling a need as fast as possible with the wrong person vs. waiting or working harder to find the right person for a mission-critical role
  • Waiting for requisitions to be open to identify and build relationships with mission-critical talent, at which point it might be too late
  • Screening and sorting quickly vs. networking to find the best person

Outbound Recruiting Metrics

Most proactive recruiting teams operate more like a sales force than a traditional recruiting force. That means that they measure outbound activity (establishing relationships and making presentations) just as much as inbound activity (taking sales orders or, in this case, making hires).

Realizing the importance of each task, as well as the different competencies required, many companies have split their sales organizations in half to have “hunters” focus on finding new business and “farmers” focus on strengthening and mining existing business relationships.

Similarly, some recruiting organizations have established central sourcing groups or recruiting strike teams that focus on specific, game-changing positions. One major software company I’ve worked with has assembled a recruiting strike team to woo senior software architects, the true visionaries and innovators in its business.

The sales cycle for these individuals can be five years or more. Therefore, they’re not measured on the number of jobs they fill as much as they are on the number of qualified individuals they identify and the relationships they create.

A recruiting team that is measured on outbound activity will build the equivalent of a sales funnel, or a series of stages in a relationship that may culminate in a person getting hired at your company. The time it takes to move people through these various stages will be measured and optimized over time, while reasons that candidates decline to move forward will inform recruitment marketing and branding efforts.

Some of the stages in a typical recruiting funnel include:

  • Candidate identified
  • Unknown level of interest/have not contacted
  • Connection established
  • Not interested
  • Contacted
  • Willing to listen to opportunities
  • Willing to refer others
  • Interested in opportunities
  • Passed on to hiring team
  • In the hiring cycle for a specific opportunity
  • Hired
  • Rejected (would hire in future)
  • Rejected (do not hire)
  • Declined

Some recruiting managers have taken to calling this progression “suspects, prospects, and applicants.” In other words, there is a difference between people who have been contacted and those who have not, and making that initial contact is really the beginning point in a long-term relationship. In a sales force, this is the equivalent of a lead versus an assigned contact, and a few proactive recruiting teams have begun to make this distinction part of their operational model.

Some organizations expect that end-to-end in-house recruiters can be proactive in the course of doing their job. I don’t believe this is a scalable model, as most in-house recruiters have a rising plate of requisitions and enough administrative responsibilities to keep them occupied.

In addition, the competencies required of proactive recruiters are much different than those of so-called “A to Z” recruiters, who very often either hate picking up the phone to make an outbound call or hate dealing with hiring managers and the hiring process. Proactive recruiting teams will excel in turning a passive candidate into a more active one.

Reporting to Your Business Leaders

Increasingly, sourcing or strategic recruiting groups are built up by business leaders with critical human capital needs. They often look for people outside of the recruiting industry to drive them, sometimes with disastrous consequences.

In these cases, selling the value to the rest of the organization can become somewhat easier because of the executive endorsement or even because the funds come directly from that business leader’s budget.

Article Continues Below

The risk is that the sponsoring business leader leaves the company, so you’ll want to make sure that you hedge your bets and build political capital with other executives.

But what about when a recruiting team identifies and tries to push through a proactive recruiting initiative or team? In an industry that values quantity over quality, proactive recruiting is not always an easy sell to business leaders who usually know very little about what lurks behind the curtain in recruiting.

In this case, alignment to business goals, revenue generation, and mission-critical roles are the real key to making an initial business case and justifying your existence on an ongoing basis.

While every employee is important, let’s face facts: some employees are more important than others. One of the most common mistakes I see in proactive recruiting efforts is taking a “boil the ocean” approach (i.e., falling into the trap of becoming a reactionary candidate generation team for all of the openings in an organization).

If the economy or business needs take a turn for the worse, the ax will eventually fall on your team because you’ll become an unnecessary luxury. Creating a sustainable proactive recruiting model that allows you to move up the value chain requires discipline. Stick to the core reason why proactive recruiting teams succeed, and remember they focus on the positions that drive the highest value for an organization and are thus an inseparable part of business success.

If the business needs senior software architects to take it to the next level, then prepare your business leaders for a two- to five-year sales cycle to close a candidate, educate them on the funnel you need to build to support the business, and prepare for a potentially enormous return on investment.

If you’re looking for senior financial consultants, expect a somewhat shorter sales cycle and smaller return on investment per head, but what you do could make an even larger impact over time. If you’re in healthcare, hiring a heart surgeon can help accelerate the building of a new practice or the expansion of an existing one, which can drive an extraordinary amount of revenue.

In any of the examples above, your business leaders will need to understand your methodology; the metrics you are trying to optimize in your sales funnel and why; the number of hires at this level that your group will be responsible for over the next two or more years; and most important, the overall impact on the business your team is having.

When you focus on strategic positions, this impact becomes relatively easy to measure. Continuing with the examples above, a senior consultant will generate revenue; a software architect will bring products to market successfully; and a heart surgeon will generate revenue and save lives. Other measures of quality, while at times subjective, can also be very powerful if presented in the right context of business success.

The recruiting industry is in the middle of a profound transformation. The traditional measures of efficiency and quantity are giving way to new measures of effectiveness and quality. The move from a reactionary to proactive discipline is underway, and how you measure your effectiveness can drive business performance and ensure your survival for years to come.

Dave Lefkow is currently the CEO of talentspark (, a consulting firm that helps companies use technology to gain a competitive advantage for talent, and a regular contributor to ERE on human capital, technology, and branding related subjects. He is also an international speaker on human capital trends and best practices, having spoken in countries as close as Canada and as far away as Malaysia and Australia. His consulting work has spanned a wide variety of industries and recruiting challenges with companies like Starbucks, Boeing, HP, Microsoft, Expedia, Washington Mutual, Nike and Swedish Medical Center.


7 Comments on “Proactive Recruiting Metrics

  1. I know I will take hits for this, but I can’t seem to keep quiet…..

    I could not even make it through this one. Reason? There is corporate or in-house recruiting and there are third party search firms. The objective of both are the same; find candidates. However, the motivation behind each is completely different. Hopefully, I dont’t think I need to explain what that motivation is.

    This article doesn’t address either specifically. He ‘morphed’ the two together.

    Its very well written, don’t get me wrong. I just don’t understand who he was addressing.

    I have said this before, and I have been critized for these comments; There are too many layers and too many intelligent individuals who subscribe to metrics and reports and percentages and statistics and blah and blah blah blah.

    Put someone in charge of the recruiting department or firm who can inspire, manage and sell. Give your recruiters some tools for research to derive names and contacts and ‘capture contacts’ and then GET THEM ON THE PHONE!!! Continue to train and educate. Role playing is the best training tool anyone can use. Lou Adler has some amazing material, best I’ve seen and very innovative. Radin, Finkel and Chahill have some very good material as well. Never, ever stop training. Also Important you need to bust your recruiters out of thier comfort zone. Give them incentives and pay them well. If they don’t meet goals or quotas, sorry, but this might not be for you.

    My point here is focus on results, not how you get to them. Be ethical of course, but as Nike says, ‘Just Do it’

    You will get your results. I have and I do.

    Gracias- Pobuta the Recruta

  2. But, if you don’t pay attention to how you get those results, how are you going to repeat success? Or will you leave it up to chance?

    Also, the article has value for corporate as well as TPRs. The ‘sales cycle’ time may be shorter for TPRs (especially if they focus on contractors and not perm candidates), or for corporate recruiters that may not have the support from management, but there is always a need to constantly build up your pipeline for the niche market you have decided to be in.

    I absolutely agree with what you said Ron, about firing up recruiters and getting them on the phone. But it doesn’t hurt to know how often recruiters actually get on the phone as well. That is one of the metrics I keep: how often, and on what reqs, for example. It helps me manage my time and plan my activities.
    Just my two cents.

  3. You appear to contradict yourself, ‘Pobuta the Recruita’ in saying ‘focus on results, not how you get to them’, after ranting on about training. Clearly training is a means to acheiving a result, not a result in itself.

    Anyway, for those who understood the article, I agree with the approach proposed by Lefkow and have been involved in setting this approach up. I have seen the following challenges and am interested in ways to address them.

    – For this model to work it is critical that the proactive sourcing team and the ‘transactional’ team dove-tail in order to acheive the ultimate result. This can be difficult to acheive when they are working toward different metrics. Are there metrics that can be common across both teams to ensure alignment?
    – The conversion point from Prospect to Applicant can be a difficult one. If accountability for this process is not clear, a fantasic talent pool could lie unused. Which team should be responsible for matching pipeline talent to vacancies?
    – Candidates sourced via proactive sourcing need often need to be treated differently to active applicants that have responded to an advert. Transactional recruiters and hiring managers don’t always see the distinction and a relationship built through the pipeline can be damaged by a manager or recruiter that treats them like a number. Are there and tried and tested means of addressing this?
    – A two to five year pipeline built by a proactive team may not acheive a significant tangible ROI in the first two years. While I acknowledge the intangible benefits available in the short and long term, the accountants who guard the cheque book often don’t care. So, for businesses than value/chose projects based on speed of payback period (for better or for worse), can shorter term returns be generated, without jeopardising the fundamentals of this model?


  4. You states that companies are becoming more proactive in their hiring process.

    I strongly disagree. Despite progressive tools….companies are still taking too much time in qualifying qualified candidates who resent being interviewed over a period of 3 to 6 months..There are also issues where companies may have 6 to 12 interviews to subject potential employers to ensure corporate qualifications. This is not only unreasonble but very unprofessional and shows a lack of respect for any potential candidate that shows interest in working for a company.

    There are still far too many internal corporate obstacles that prevent job seekers from being successful in their quest to become corporate employees. It would be wise for most companies to demonstrate being practive by putting words in construct hiring actions rather than empty corporate political words that are false and misleading.

    Josie Erent
    Talented Minds
    Division of Silicon Executive Search Inc.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *